Long-term survival in the randomized trial of drug treatment in mild to moderate to moderate hypertension of the Oslo study 1972–3
Journal article, Peer reviewed
MetadataShow full item record
- Artikler / Articles 
Original versionEuropean journal of internal medicine. 2015, 26, 123-126
Background: In the Oslo cardiovascular study of 1972–3 a 5-year randomized trial in mild to moderate hypertension was performed. Several changes in treatment practices have been recommended since that time. We followed the mortality patterns up to 40 years. Methods: Invited to the Oslo study screening were 25,915 middle-aged men and 16,203 (63%) participated. Reexaminations were done to select suitable participants into the trial. Men had blood pressure 150–179/95–109 mm Hg and the active group (n = 406) was treated with thiazides, alpha-methyldopa and propranolol versus untreated controls (n = 379). Cox regression analysis was used for statistical analyses. Results: There was no trend towards reduction in total mortality by treatment. A nominally significant increase in risk of death at first myocardial infarction was observed in the trial treatment group across the follow-up period, HR = 1.51 (1.01–2.25); (P = 0.042). The excess risk developed rapidly during the first 15 years, but the gap between the groups diminished to a large extent during the next 15 years, but the curves stayed at a certain distance for the last 10 years. Cerebrovascular death tended to be non-significantly reduced, HR = 0.85 (0.52–1.41). Conclusions: Drug treatment of mild hypertensive men initiated in the 1970s did not reduce mortality at first MI or total mortality. However, during the period (late 1980s and whole 1990s), when large changes in hypertension treatment practices occurred into regimes with more use of combination therapies including metabolically neutral drugs at lower doses, beneficial effects on MI mortality could be observed.
Dette er siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde små forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på www.elsevier.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2015.01.013 / This is the final text version of the article, and it may contain minor differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available at www.elsevier.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2015.01.013