Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLei, Jiao
dc.contributor.authorJianping, Xing
dc.contributor.authorLi, Frank Yong
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-15T11:35:48Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationLei, J., Jianping, X., & Li, F. Y. (2009). Performance comparison of residual related algorithms for ToA positioning in wireless terrestrial and sensor networks. Paper presented at the Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology, 2009. Wireless VITAE 2009. 1st International Conference on, Aalborg.en
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4244-4066-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/137727
dc.description©2009 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE." Article also available from publisher: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2009.5172462en
dc.description.abstractTime of Arrival (ToA) is a popular technique for terrestrial positioning. This paper presents a comparison of ToA based residual related positioning algorithms in wireless terrestrial and sensor networks in both long range outdoor and short range indoor environments. Using ToA distance measurement error models in both environments, we compare the performance of the Least Square Estimation (LSE), Residual Weighting (Rwgh), Iterative Minimum Residual (IMR), Select Residual Weighting (SRwgh) and Lower-Computational-Cost Residual Weighting (LCC-Rwgh) algorithms. The latter three algorithms are inherited from the Rwgh algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Two aspects of the performance comparison are addressed: computational complexity and positioning accuracy. In performance comparison, the complexity comparison is done by analyzing the number of LSE iterations while the accuracy comparison is conducted through a set of simulations in both environments.en
dc.format.extent380499 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherIEEEen
dc.titlePerformance comparison of residual related algorithms for ToA positioning in wireless terrestrial and sensor networksen
dc.typeConference objecten
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Technology: 500::Information and communication technology: 550::Telecommunication: 552en
dc.source.pagenumber278-283en


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record